Material for newsrooms, portals and authorities
This page holds the cleared press text, a short profile, the citation rules and direct contact. Every statement can be counter-checked against the linked primary sources.
Press contact of the desk
TRUST WATCH is not a law firm and provides no legal services. We answer case-specific enquiries only where they concern the documentation itself.
Press text
This text is cleared for reuse, in full or in part, in print and online. Please name TRUST WATCH as the source and link the page you cite.
TRUST WATCH documents corporate and officer links around Nathalie Isabella Magnell and Niklas Felixberger. TRUST WATCH is a source-driven desk for register and network documentation. It currently covers 9 networks with 41 individual records on 46 companies and 10 people across 6 jurisdictions, including Sweden, the United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Estonia and Germany. Every record names its date, source, evidence class (A–F) and review status. Register extracts are kept separate from observations and unconfirmed tip-offs; contradictions are disclosed rather than smoothed over. TRUST WATCH assigns no scores, ratings or credit grades and makes no finding of unlawful conduct. Instead of a score, each check item carries a clear status: documented, to be reviewed separately, or no link established. The documentation is available in German, English, French, Italian and Swedish. Affected people find guidance on next steps; third-party tip-offs are recorded in a structured way and stay marked unconfirmed until verified. All networks: https://trust-watch.org/warnungen Methodology and evidence classes: https://trust-watch.org/methodik Corrections: https://trust-watch.org/korrekturen Press contact: redaktion@trust-watch.org
Short profile (boilerplate)
TRUST WATCH is an independent desk for register and network documentation. It keeps register extracts, observations and unconfirmed tip-offs separate, states source, date and evidence class per record, and is neither a law firm nor a legal service provider. Web: https://trust-watch.org
Citing and linking
- Please cite the specific network page rather than the home page – each network page carries date, source and evidence class.
- Carry the review status over: “documented”, “to be reviewed separately” or “no link established”. An open point must not be reported as a finding.
- A documented link implies no allegation of unlawful conduct; such conclusions are not part of our documentation.
- Register data changes. Please check the same-day official extract before publication and state your own retrieval date.
- We supply images and video on request; the motifs on this site are not generally cleared for reuse.
Citation example: TRUST WATCH, „Netzwerk Invoicea / Karlavägen (SE)“, https://trust-watch.org/warnungen/invoicea, retrieved …
Checked bodies that publish warnings
These bodies publish warnings or checklists themselves and work with source references. They are the obvious addressees for a submission or citation – inclusion or linking is entirely their own decision.
Publishes provider warnings based on consumer complaints. Suitable for submissions involving affected consumers.
Maintains a continuously updated warning list on investment offers, with a source per entry.
Warns about unauthorised financial business and accepts tip-offs. Competent where licensable business may be involved.
Publishes checklists on dubious providers and regularly links primary sources and registers.
Primary registers underpinning our evidence classes A and B. The fastest counter-check for newsrooms.
The bodies listed are addressees for submissions. No cooperation, endorsement or confirmation by them is implied.